Metropolis
describe the city as an unstable and uncertain space that is not defined by the interactions and differences of those who inhabit it but by the indeterminacy of the symbolic products generated by said interactions, the communication models and the way in which it is rethinking space as a site of confinement that fails to classify the confluence of different practices.
Ruins
It establishes similarities with the idea of metropolis, but understands the city and its architecture as an ideologically worn-out space, as a result of economic operations and the establishment of standards of behaviour established by the languages of the system. In this sense there would be no differences between capitalist or socialist societies, since both are reflected in architecture as models of support for exhausted ideologies.
Fiction
It refers to the absence of a complete idea of reality and instead participates in what is given to us as configurations of reality.
Uprooting. Series
When you constantly cross borders, you remain in a space of transit where, out of tension rather than conciliation, you begin to generate a series of works that dialogue with this transitory and very little-defined space. However, these journeys linked to a more or less errant migration become productive when one intends to develop an artistic practice that involves exploring the links or ruptures generated in the interactions of art with the social, especially if you are constantly going from one place to another as in our case, as we have kept traveling through various cities and interacting with different practices, levels and social frameworks temporarily.
When you constantly cross borders, you remain in a space of transit where, out of tension rather than conciliation, you begin to generate a series of works that dialogue with this transitory and very little-defined space. However, these journeys linked to a more or less errant migration become productive when one intends to develop an artistic practice that involves exploring the links or ruptures generated in the interactions of art with the social, especially if you are constantly going from one place to another as in our case, as we have kept traveling through various cities and interacting with different practices, levels and social frameworks temporarily.
Reconfigurations
It tries to understand how art is constantly reconfigured to construct a political message, which never becomes a new message but rather the same question that is repeatedly posed, that is, what changes is not the message but the ways of producing it. We pose an immediate question that refers to the urgency of establishing a location, a location that allows us to understand and translate what is different, which is utopian in contemporary reality, since there are no longer localizable political-cultural locations, hence also the idea of a poorly defined cultural action that generates the feeling of myopia in the face of what can be established as different.
